Grading Content & Exposing Bias

The Record · weekly wrap-up

The Week in Grades

Every week Clad wraps up what its fact-checks found: the best- and worst-graded coverage, the claims most disputed by the evidence, and the stories that were covered heavily from one side. This is the same review the Sunday newsletter carries — kept here for the record.

Free account · no card

See grades free with an account.

Letter grades, lean scores, charts, midterms tools, and Reader Reactions unlock the moment you sign up. No card required.

  • Grades on every report
  • Lean scores & charts
  • Quiz · midterms ballot · newsletter

Most disputed claims

disputed

Targeted approval timeline of less than a year risks harming communities and ecosystems long-term

EcoJustice and similar groups cite past examples; government and legal analyses counter that one-year decision timeline (post-studies) plus regional assessments aim to balance growth with protections, with some prior SARA exemptions walked back after consultation. Read the full report →

disputed

Europe should impose much more aggressive sanctions on the Israeli government for its deliberate settlement policy and the genocide in Gaza

Strong interpretive claim by the guest; settlements are viewed as illegal by most of the international community and the ICJ advisory opinion, but Israel disputes this; “genocide” remains a contested allegation before the ICJ with no final determination. Read the full report →

disputed

Suspects had been under investigation for a long time and were plotting to cause real damage

Trump stated this verbatim; however, senior police sources told The Guardian the arrests followed a public tip and the operation was not intelligence-led. Read the full report →

disputed

Our country is doing great, better than ever before

Subjective; economic data as of September 2026 shows steady 2.1-2.3% GDP growth and ~4.2-4.3% unemployment, improved from prior lows but not universally 'better than ever' given inflation and other metrics. Read the full report →

disputed

Donalds' insurance plan builds on DeSantis reforms with tort retention, regulatory changes, home hardening, and permitting reform to lower premiums 20%; Jolly's plan is a government takeover that would double/triple premiums and impose a $1,000 hurricane tax.

20% figure is Donalds' campaign projection; Jolly's state catastrophic fund proposal claims 60-70% savings by removing hurricane risk from private policies and disputes the tax characterization, calling it a reallocation of existing funds. Read the full report →